House Bill 45 to declare all magazine weapons illegal and to require strict licensing for gun ownership.What are your views of the pending liberal legislation to drastically diminish American gun ownership rights?
Nice try, before you jump to conclusions how about you read more about the bill. It will never pass because there are no sponsors for the bill. It was created by a lone senator and you need sponsors for bills to pass. Which means it is DOA. It will never become law.
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45鈥?/a>
Stop letting the NRA delude you and lie to you. Guess what, the Senate which is mainly full of ';liberals'; recently passed an amendment that allows guns in checked bags on Amtrak. And Amtrak opposed the bill.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/193589
It is a good article. Guess what. Liberals hunt and own guns too. What a surprise.What are your views of the pending liberal legislation to drastically diminish American gun ownership rights?
Without Congressional approval, the President now has the power to transfer whole populations to any part of the country, the power to suspend the Press and to force a national registration of all persons. The President, in essence, has dictatorial powers never provided to him under the Constitution. The President has the power to suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in a real or perceived emergency. Unlike Lincoln and Roosevelt, these powers are not derived from a wartime need, but from any crisis, domestic or foreign, hostile or economic. Roosevelt created extraordinary measures during the Great Depression, but any President faced with a similar, or lesser, economic crisis now has extraordinary powers to assume dictatorial status. ';
Maybe this is a reason that Obama took control of the Census program right away after being sworn into office?Notice where it says hostile or ECONOMIC.Also notice real or PERCEIVED emergency.
From the Executive Orders webpage:
HR 45 has little to no chance of passing. This is not the first time the bill has been introduced by the guy from IL.
To those who think that we are overreacting to NRA propaganda, the NRA has barely mentioned it. To those who think we should just ignore anti-gun pending legislation, do you suggest we just pretend that anti gun legislation doesn't exist?
And if so many liberals are pro gun, why in the world do you insist on voting in anti- gun politicians? It would suggest most liberals are conflicted....
The gun can't be un-invented, and limiting law-abiding citizens to lesser firepower than criminals wield, is , well...moronic. If you don't want a gun, don't buy one. Remember the police can't be everywhere at once, and personally I'd rather have one and not need it than need one and not have it. Besides when was the last time you heard of the police stopping a crime, instead of investigating it after the fact?
Gun control means being able to hit your target. If I have a 'hot button' issue, this is definitely it. Don't even think about taking my guns. My rights are not negotiable, and I am totally unwilling to compromise when it comes to the Second Amendment.
Congressional watch groups have also reported that there are no co-sponsors to the bill, and there is very little chance it will be adopted.
This is a proposition from one anti-gun extremist, which in time I think you'll find many liberals are not.
Scares the hell out of me. The government is getting way out of hand and if that bill doesn't convince people what Obama and the government are up to then nothing will and we can kiss our freedom goodbye.
For those of you who don't believe there is such a thing, or that it isn't exactly what he said, please go heree to read the actual bill. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h45鈥?/a>
I do believe in gun control its vital to the safety of America as I use both hands when shooting a gun as to have better accuracy
If it passes it will be one of the most ignored pieces of legislation in history.
your asking people to actually read the legislation? HA!
It better not pass
sounds like the Fourth Reich is at our doorstep.
Gun control = not giving guns to idiots...it only takes one to ruin it for the rest of us...magazine weapons?...well tell THAT to our fellow brethren fighting wars that they aren't even meant to fight for those who don't even want anyone else to fight for. As for the second amendment...it only pertains to the TIME that it was drafted for...it needs to be amended because today is TODAY and not THEN...it was more so for people to take up and bear arms/guns together...but not everyone needs to do so...in the end, it is misleading and we all just watch our own country shoot our own people...we are all people...humans...we all have brains...so we should all learn to use them...
Complete total and utter nonsense, lies, propaganda paid for by the NRA---deliberate deception. There is no such plan, no such bill.
More corrupted lies, more red meat thrown to ignorant people who won't can't read a newspaper and learn the facts about what is going on in the world.
I think it's a great first step, and long overdue.
But of course, the gun lobby is going to fight it tooth and nail, so we'll see how far it gets.
A figment of your imagination.
Friday, February 12, 2010
What is the difference between Humanities and Liberal Arts?
As in, a degree in Humanities vs. a degree in Liberal Arts (any level). I'm looking for which one will allow a combination of studies in History, Literature, Arts, and Paleo-sciences.What is the difference between Humanities and Liberal Arts?
Liberal arts includes humanities, creative and performing arts, social sciences and (generally, though not officially at some university) natural sciences.
Humanities are classes like: English, philosophy, art history, religious studies, etc.
Paleo-sciences will either be considered a social science (as a branch of anthropology) or a natural science depending upon your particular university.
So, in short, a degree in Liberal Arts will enable you to study history, literature, arts, and paleo-sciences. A degree in the humanities will probably not allow history (though some schools may consider that to be a humanity) or paleo-sciences.What is the difference between Humanities and Liberal Arts?
Liberal Arts is more broad and encompasses humanities along with the other studies that you're interested in. Humanities is just a category of liberal arts focusing more on civilization like philosophy.
Liberal arts includes humanities, creative and performing arts, social sciences and (generally, though not officially at some university) natural sciences.
Humanities are classes like: English, philosophy, art history, religious studies, etc.
Paleo-sciences will either be considered a social science (as a branch of anthropology) or a natural science depending upon your particular university.
So, in short, a degree in Liberal Arts will enable you to study history, literature, arts, and paleo-sciences. A degree in the humanities will probably not allow history (though some schools may consider that to be a humanity) or paleo-sciences.What is the difference between Humanities and Liberal Arts?
Liberal Arts is more broad and encompasses humanities along with the other studies that you're interested in. Humanities is just a category of liberal arts focusing more on civilization like philosophy.
Why do registered Republicans get to collect liberal socialist unemployment?
They don't support it, and are costing the country BILLIONS by being hypocritical and collecting yet another government ';bennie';.Why do registered Republicans get to collect liberal socialist unemployment?
...because it's the Republicans (who still have a job) that go to WORK everyday to pay for the Dummy'crat, Liberal, entitlement Programs !Why do registered Republicans get to collect liberal socialist unemployment?
Lisa I think that your Americanised definition of Liberalism is a bit weird. Liberalism as an ideology promulgates, by definition, economic freedoms which is often associated with laissiz faire politics. The fact that liberals political followers become unemployed forces them to collect social security means that they are no longer liberated per se but have become included into the social security safety net of government welfarism. Therefore, when you state liberal socialist is like saying a free prisoner or something that are complete opposites.
Socialists on the other hand understand their socio-economic conditions and often feel compelled to defend the class struggle of the welfare state dependents in social security forums. This is so as to ensure that liberals do not gnaw away at their social security benefits through privatisation of former governmental services such as employment service provisions to private contract tenderers who charge a commissioned fee to rob government and taxpayers blind, all the while, they are purportedly providing services to people, but, in truth, they are guilty of bureaucratic goal displacement and, in thus, they are corruptible for instituting inefficient government practises, and draining government resources and creating a heath robinson filibustering programmes at the cost of good government practise.
Because they are ';entitled'; to it. You libbies love entitlements, and that should include when those other than Dems are receiving them. I have been unemployed in the past and collected, but I have also paid hundreds of thousands in taxes in my life, so I have certainly ';earned'; the right to collect unemployment when unemployed.
I guess responder ';Chucky'; has never been to the inner cities chock full of Dems (overwhelmingly minorities) consistently collecting their government checks while living in govt. subsidized housing, subscribing to ';Premium'; cable, owning multiple cell phones, and having multiple children out of wedlock, etc.....
Nice voter base you Dems have there. Think again Chucky.
Because they are Grade-A hypocrites. I used to work for one of those Grade-A hypocrite Repugnican Conservatives, one who actually believes that the ONLY reason someone would ever be unemployed is because they don't want to work. Well, she once quit a job because ';$70,000 a year isn't enough';.
Of course, she found a way to make it look like she was ';laid off';, and immediately got herself on unemployment.
Very ironic that the very people who complain the loudest about others being on welfare and sucking the Nation financially dry are among the first to get in line for unemployment benefits. It is the height of hypocrisy to be so against something, yet take full advantage of it.
As for the cracks about ';liberals'; always being the ones to not work, I am taking whatever work I can get, which is damned little, had a chance to get on unemployment and passed it up -- and I'm one of those evil, ';welfare-dependent'; so-called ';liberals';. So much for the theory that us ';liberals'; are such lazy turds.
I would just like to point out Bev's answer of ';Because THEY are the ones paying into it since libs don't work.'; actually makes no sense whatsoever yet she got 6 thumbs up. Good lord YA isn't pulling in the brightest minds is it?
They get it because smarter people force them to endure systems that keep them alive. Because stupidity is not excuse enough to allow them to all starve off and because if they did die off the trailer park market would collapse potentially costing the US hundreds of dollars.
They were forced to help pay for it so they deserve to collect on it. You want to pay for other people since you like those programs. You should be happy.
Socialism means giving up some of what you have to help people who need it. You didn't think it was about getting more did you?
Good question isn't unemployment another ';Socialist Liberal'; program. I thought they hated socialism.
And what's up with this sterotype that Liberals don't work?...I'm inclined to believe the very ones screaming this are the very ones jobless. I would love to see who some of these people are in person %26amp; how they actually live.
Because it is the Republicans who actually worked before they were getting unemployment. They collect unemployment as they recover from something or actually seek a job since they want one, not to live off of unemployment.
i worked fr it my tax payed into it allso my employer payed into it for me by no means is it wellfare or socialist .it's a bank account whe work runs slow .when you get a job and climb off daddys wallet you will understand someday
I collected unemployment for 4 months when I got laid off, but I paid into the system for 25 years.
So the small amount I made collecting wasn't anywhere near what I put into it.
Because they are the main people who are getting it. This exists because and for them. Have you ever been to the south!? Welfare central. That is why they are so fat. No jobs and no drive. Just Tea Parties.
The money to pay for those programs is taken by force. If someone forced me to pay for a drink, whether I wanted one or not, you better believe I'm going to drink my drink before I go.
They are allowed to collect SS benefits though they to do so much less frequently than registered Democrats.
Because THEY are the ones paying into it since libs don't work.
pardon me, but i believe EVERYONE pay into it well, the ones who work. so you are not really that smart in your observation....not even well thought out...
No, I never have.
Good question lol. Why don't they just turn it down if they are so against it? And the welfare too?
'cause they PAID the taxes to finanace it
...because it's the Republicans (who still have a job) that go to WORK everyday to pay for the Dummy'crat, Liberal, entitlement Programs !Why do registered Republicans get to collect liberal socialist unemployment?
Lisa I think that your Americanised definition of Liberalism is a bit weird. Liberalism as an ideology promulgates, by definition, economic freedoms which is often associated with laissiz faire politics. The fact that liberals political followers become unemployed forces them to collect social security means that they are no longer liberated per se but have become included into the social security safety net of government welfarism. Therefore, when you state liberal socialist is like saying a free prisoner or something that are complete opposites.
Socialists on the other hand understand their socio-economic conditions and often feel compelled to defend the class struggle of the welfare state dependents in social security forums. This is so as to ensure that liberals do not gnaw away at their social security benefits through privatisation of former governmental services such as employment service provisions to private contract tenderers who charge a commissioned fee to rob government and taxpayers blind, all the while, they are purportedly providing services to people, but, in truth, they are guilty of bureaucratic goal displacement and, in thus, they are corruptible for instituting inefficient government practises, and draining government resources and creating a heath robinson filibustering programmes at the cost of good government practise.
Because they are ';entitled'; to it. You libbies love entitlements, and that should include when those other than Dems are receiving them. I have been unemployed in the past and collected, but I have also paid hundreds of thousands in taxes in my life, so I have certainly ';earned'; the right to collect unemployment when unemployed.
I guess responder ';Chucky'; has never been to the inner cities chock full of Dems (overwhelmingly minorities) consistently collecting their government checks while living in govt. subsidized housing, subscribing to ';Premium'; cable, owning multiple cell phones, and having multiple children out of wedlock, etc.....
Nice voter base you Dems have there. Think again Chucky.
Because they are Grade-A hypocrites. I used to work for one of those Grade-A hypocrite Repugnican Conservatives, one who actually believes that the ONLY reason someone would ever be unemployed is because they don't want to work. Well, she once quit a job because ';$70,000 a year isn't enough';.
Of course, she found a way to make it look like she was ';laid off';, and immediately got herself on unemployment.
Very ironic that the very people who complain the loudest about others being on welfare and sucking the Nation financially dry are among the first to get in line for unemployment benefits. It is the height of hypocrisy to be so against something, yet take full advantage of it.
As for the cracks about ';liberals'; always being the ones to not work, I am taking whatever work I can get, which is damned little, had a chance to get on unemployment and passed it up -- and I'm one of those evil, ';welfare-dependent'; so-called ';liberals';. So much for the theory that us ';liberals'; are such lazy turds.
I would just like to point out Bev's answer of ';Because THEY are the ones paying into it since libs don't work.'; actually makes no sense whatsoever yet she got 6 thumbs up. Good lord YA isn't pulling in the brightest minds is it?
They get it because smarter people force them to endure systems that keep them alive. Because stupidity is not excuse enough to allow them to all starve off and because if they did die off the trailer park market would collapse potentially costing the US hundreds of dollars.
They were forced to help pay for it so they deserve to collect on it. You want to pay for other people since you like those programs. You should be happy.
Socialism means giving up some of what you have to help people who need it. You didn't think it was about getting more did you?
Good question isn't unemployment another ';Socialist Liberal'; program. I thought they hated socialism.
And what's up with this sterotype that Liberals don't work?...I'm inclined to believe the very ones screaming this are the very ones jobless. I would love to see who some of these people are in person %26amp; how they actually live.
Because it is the Republicans who actually worked before they were getting unemployment. They collect unemployment as they recover from something or actually seek a job since they want one, not to live off of unemployment.
i worked fr it my tax payed into it allso my employer payed into it for me by no means is it wellfare or socialist .it's a bank account whe work runs slow .when you get a job and climb off daddys wallet you will understand someday
I collected unemployment for 4 months when I got laid off, but I paid into the system for 25 years.
So the small amount I made collecting wasn't anywhere near what I put into it.
Because they are the main people who are getting it. This exists because and for them. Have you ever been to the south!? Welfare central. That is why they are so fat. No jobs and no drive. Just Tea Parties.
The money to pay for those programs is taken by force. If someone forced me to pay for a drink, whether I wanted one or not, you better believe I'm going to drink my drink before I go.
They are allowed to collect SS benefits though they to do so much less frequently than registered Democrats.
Because THEY are the ones paying into it since libs don't work.
pardon me, but i believe EVERYONE pay into it well, the ones who work. so you are not really that smart in your observation....not even well thought out...
No, I never have.
Good question lol. Why don't they just turn it down if they are so against it? And the welfare too?
'cause they PAID the taxes to finanace it
Is anyone else annoyed at how the liberal press handled the inauguration?
Why the heck do we have to bring up the fact that someone saying a prayer is against gay marriage. That is the reason this country splits apart. Just say the guys giving a prayer and leave it.Is anyone else annoyed at how the liberal press handled the inauguration?
All liberals have fine-teeth combs so they can nit-pick at every minuscule detail, whether or not it has any meaning. I agree with you, friend - crap like that is what drives us apart more and more.Is anyone else annoyed at how the liberal press handled the inauguration?
Yes. Many annoyances today.
I'm annoyed that race has to be injected into every inaugural story today.
I'm annoyed at how spiteful the libs still in booing Bush and singing that ';hey hey hey goodbye'; song as his chopper flew away.
There was a preacher today making a racist comment about when will ';White acknowledge right'; or something like that.
I've been bouncing between channels. I wanted both perspectives. Poisonous rhetoric is coming from one of them. And it isn't liberal. I think you may want to take your own to task before sniveling about this.
If you believe that was just libs booing you are nuts. As bad form as it was it was more than libs.
They are reporting on the things that people have been saying about the man, which is, as reporters, their job. If no one had said anything about the man, they would never have said that.
Perhaps it's because they thought he would be kow-towing to the gays today, but I didn't see any of it. They're probably shell shocked. What is the percentage of gays in this nation? OH yeah..... not big enough.
I am annoyed with everything the liberals did today, they are a bunch of low class people, very very embarrassed to recognize them as American citizens.
Why the heck are you upset about one person's opinion??
I was not surprised. It was the same way during the election. check it out www.howobamagotelected.com
No. And this was also reported by Fox News
All liberals have fine-teeth combs so they can nit-pick at every minuscule detail, whether or not it has any meaning. I agree with you, friend - crap like that is what drives us apart more and more.Is anyone else annoyed at how the liberal press handled the inauguration?
Yes. Many annoyances today.
I'm annoyed that race has to be injected into every inaugural story today.
I'm annoyed at how spiteful the libs still in booing Bush and singing that ';hey hey hey goodbye'; song as his chopper flew away.
There was a preacher today making a racist comment about when will ';White acknowledge right'; or something like that.
I've been bouncing between channels. I wanted both perspectives. Poisonous rhetoric is coming from one of them. And it isn't liberal. I think you may want to take your own to task before sniveling about this.
If you believe that was just libs booing you are nuts. As bad form as it was it was more than libs.
They are reporting on the things that people have been saying about the man, which is, as reporters, their job. If no one had said anything about the man, they would never have said that.
Perhaps it's because they thought he would be kow-towing to the gays today, but I didn't see any of it. They're probably shell shocked. What is the percentage of gays in this nation? OH yeah..... not big enough.
I am annoyed with everything the liberals did today, they are a bunch of low class people, very very embarrassed to recognize them as American citizens.
Why the heck are you upset about one person's opinion??
I was not surprised. It was the same way during the election. check it out www.howobamagotelected.com
No. And this was also reported by Fox News
What is the most patriotic thing a liberal does?
In their limited minds, they consider their traitorous actions (such as voting their scumbags in) as ';patriotic.';
But because most liberals are counterfeit Americans, their ';patriotism'; usually involves loyalty to wrong individuals causes.
For example, liberals actually believed they were being patriotic for electing Barack Hussein Obama because of their unprecedent hatred of President Bush. However, this was a betrayal worse than that committed by Benedict Arnold.What is the most patriotic thing a liberal does?
Define patriotism.
Other similar ambiguous terms in the common lexicon; liberal, conservative, Christian, freedom, liberty, racist, representative government, and last but not least ';American.';
None of us know what the hell the other is really talking about anymore because these are all a few examples of words that have lost their common working meaning.What is the most patriotic thing a liberal does?
“Patriot: the person who can holler the loudest without knowing what he is hollering about.” - Mark Twain
You said: I am a stay at home Mom during the day and work part time at night, I volunteer at our local soup kitchen, I write to our congressmen to stop this horrible mistake called NHC for all and I am an editor part time for a well known mag, all this in my spare time
Oh, I'm sure! Isn't this what all Conservatives say. Who the hell uses the term ';soup kitchen'; anymore anyway. You're full of crap.
Serve in the military. You think it's made of 100% Republicans? What have YOU done, since you asked the question? Impress me with your answer.
I've worked at soup kitchens, volunteered at schools, etc. too. So what? These aren't big sacrifices such that you can get on a high horse and attempt to make a point that liberals aren't patriotic. And don't pretend ';I really just want to know'; is the motivation.
Well, I teach. Which is very patriotic because you cannot have a free country unless you have an educated country and a free education.
But there are many other things that liberals do and support that is patriotic:
Supports the Constitution of the U.S.
Supports a robust public library system.
Supports policy that supports a more level playing field for all Americans and not one that only supports the corporate elites and their rich kids in this country.
Supports freedom of speech and the right to be heard.
Supports education for all
Supports healthcare for all
Supports civil rights for all (and many liberals have lost their lives with this one).
Supports the culture through support of the arts.
Supports the troops by wanting them to have the best medical system for them through the V.A and the best education through a GI bill.
Supports a healthy political system by wanting to get corporate interest money out of D.C and the electoral system.
Supports a woman's right to choose and a woman's right to be free of government intrusion of her body.
Supports the right for all people to feel safe in their homes and in their person by supporting not only guns rights in the home but by supporting a good system of law enforcement.
There are so much more.
I have asked myself this a lot. I've watched liberals call conservatives unpatriotic, but what do they do to better their country? They weaken defenses, they limit the citizens, they want to diversify cultures and make American culture nonexistent, and they think a larger government will solve all their problems.
I'm in the Reserves and am going to start my Freshman year at UCLA in a month.
I appreciate the thumbs down for my loving my country. Yes folks, liberals are entitled to fight to their death protecting America the Beautiful and to cherish this wonderful nation.
Support the U.S. military, believe in and uphold the Constitutional values that the country was built on and be proud of the American public for the good we can achieve in the nation and world if we try.
I like to believe that this is the same for conservatives as well. Call me an optimist.
All the same things conservatives do that are deemed patriotic, such as volunteering for military service, honoring our veterans, and celebrating American independence. Conservatives are really fooling themselves if they think they are inherently any more patriotic than liberals.
We support, the underprivileged, the environment, and the education of people.
What do Conservatives do besides trying to protect the big corporations.
best trolling question I've seen on this site so far
yes yes we get your drift, conservatives are upstanding patriots and liberals are horrible traitors. Please get off my internets and go back to watching Faux News.
btw nobody believes you actually do all those things lol
I wonder how many of the right wing morons who TDed St John have done as he has and joined the military, whether active or reserves....
Moves the country FORWARD (as opposed to letting it stagnate or pushing for it to go backward!)
I'll be damned if I can think of anything, how about paying for me to vacation with the POPE.......
Right now, try to educate ignorant Americans.
Burns the American Flag
Helps progress the country forward.
In Ted Kennedy's case, die.
Oops, Tracey beat me to it but for the children dear libs, follow Ted.
Dies, Just like Ted.
stays home on election day.
They went to Iraq and stood up as human shields for the soldiers... err, the Iraqi people. Oh wait.... Never mind.white hair
But because most liberals are counterfeit Americans, their ';patriotism'; usually involves loyalty to wrong individuals causes.
For example, liberals actually believed they were being patriotic for electing Barack Hussein Obama because of their unprecedent hatred of President Bush. However, this was a betrayal worse than that committed by Benedict Arnold.What is the most patriotic thing a liberal does?
Define patriotism.
Other similar ambiguous terms in the common lexicon; liberal, conservative, Christian, freedom, liberty, racist, representative government, and last but not least ';American.';
None of us know what the hell the other is really talking about anymore because these are all a few examples of words that have lost their common working meaning.What is the most patriotic thing a liberal does?
“Patriot: the person who can holler the loudest without knowing what he is hollering about.” - Mark Twain
You said: I am a stay at home Mom during the day and work part time at night, I volunteer at our local soup kitchen, I write to our congressmen to stop this horrible mistake called NHC for all and I am an editor part time for a well known mag, all this in my spare time
Oh, I'm sure! Isn't this what all Conservatives say. Who the hell uses the term ';soup kitchen'; anymore anyway. You're full of crap.
Serve in the military. You think it's made of 100% Republicans? What have YOU done, since you asked the question? Impress me with your answer.
I've worked at soup kitchens, volunteered at schools, etc. too. So what? These aren't big sacrifices such that you can get on a high horse and attempt to make a point that liberals aren't patriotic. And don't pretend ';I really just want to know'; is the motivation.
Well, I teach. Which is very patriotic because you cannot have a free country unless you have an educated country and a free education.
But there are many other things that liberals do and support that is patriotic:
Supports the Constitution of the U.S.
Supports a robust public library system.
Supports policy that supports a more level playing field for all Americans and not one that only supports the corporate elites and their rich kids in this country.
Supports freedom of speech and the right to be heard.
Supports education for all
Supports healthcare for all
Supports civil rights for all (and many liberals have lost their lives with this one).
Supports the culture through support of the arts.
Supports the troops by wanting them to have the best medical system for them through the V.A and the best education through a GI bill.
Supports a healthy political system by wanting to get corporate interest money out of D.C and the electoral system.
Supports a woman's right to choose and a woman's right to be free of government intrusion of her body.
Supports the right for all people to feel safe in their homes and in their person by supporting not only guns rights in the home but by supporting a good system of law enforcement.
There are so much more.
I have asked myself this a lot. I've watched liberals call conservatives unpatriotic, but what do they do to better their country? They weaken defenses, they limit the citizens, they want to diversify cultures and make American culture nonexistent, and they think a larger government will solve all their problems.
I'm in the Reserves and am going to start my Freshman year at UCLA in a month.
I appreciate the thumbs down for my loving my country. Yes folks, liberals are entitled to fight to their death protecting America the Beautiful and to cherish this wonderful nation.
Support the U.S. military, believe in and uphold the Constitutional values that the country was built on and be proud of the American public for the good we can achieve in the nation and world if we try.
I like to believe that this is the same for conservatives as well. Call me an optimist.
All the same things conservatives do that are deemed patriotic, such as volunteering for military service, honoring our veterans, and celebrating American independence. Conservatives are really fooling themselves if they think they are inherently any more patriotic than liberals.
We support, the underprivileged, the environment, and the education of people.
What do Conservatives do besides trying to protect the big corporations.
best trolling question I've seen on this site so far
yes yes we get your drift, conservatives are upstanding patriots and liberals are horrible traitors. Please get off my internets and go back to watching Faux News.
btw nobody believes you actually do all those things lol
I wonder how many of the right wing morons who TDed St John have done as he has and joined the military, whether active or reserves....
Moves the country FORWARD (as opposed to letting it stagnate or pushing for it to go backward!)
I'll be damned if I can think of anything, how about paying for me to vacation with the POPE.......
Right now, try to educate ignorant Americans.
Burns the American Flag
Helps progress the country forward.
In Ted Kennedy's case, die.
Oops, Tracey beat me to it but for the children dear libs, follow Ted.
Dies, Just like Ted.
stays home on election day.
They went to Iraq and stood up as human shields for the soldiers... err, the Iraqi people. Oh wait.... Never mind.
What is the fuel value of a liberal politician?
I think Al Gore would make for an excellent source of alternative energy!What is the fuel value of a liberal politician?
They're not even capable of igniting as fuel, since they're so sodden and wet from being cry babies and from crying out that the sk is falling.What is the fuel value of a liberal politician?
Al Gore is being handsomely paid to espouse his philosophies. Have never read or heard him volunteer to demonstrate his philosophical meanderings.
You get more hot air out of the conservative ones.
They're not even capable of igniting as fuel, since they're so sodden and wet from being cry babies and from crying out that the sk is falling.What is the fuel value of a liberal politician?
Al Gore is being handsomely paid to espouse his philosophies. Have never read or heard him volunteer to demonstrate his philosophical meanderings.
You get more hot air out of the conservative ones.
Why do repubelickens complain about the liberal media when they run Fox news and A M radio talk shows?
And yes, we liberals want us to be destroyed, give away our money, be attacked by terrorists, take away all our money and give it to lazy people, and let us be a third world country. It is just the thing we want.Why do repubelickens complain about the liberal media when they run Fox news and A M radio talk shows?
They also control the washington times, london times, wall street journal, NY post. But since no one fact checks republicans on their assertions, they get away with itWhy do repubelickens complain about the liberal media when they run Fox news and A M radio talk shows?
I don't complain about the liberal media and I recognize that Fox News and most of the A M radio talk shows are conservative.
I am impressed by your remarks -- finally a liberal who is honest about what liberals in general want. How refreshing.
WOW, like five outlets which are expressly conservative, to about FIVE MILLION expressly liberal propaganda machines. Seems real balanced to me(not)!
They also control the washington times, london times, wall street journal, NY post. But since no one fact checks republicans on their assertions, they get away with itWhy do repubelickens complain about the liberal media when they run Fox news and A M radio talk shows?
I don't complain about the liberal media and I recognize that Fox News and most of the A M radio talk shows are conservative.
I am impressed by your remarks -- finally a liberal who is honest about what liberals in general want. How refreshing.
WOW, like five outlets which are expressly conservative, to about FIVE MILLION expressly liberal propaganda machines. Seems real balanced to me(not)!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)